翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Smith Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania ・ Smith Township, Whitley County, Indiana ・ Smith v Croft (No 2) ・ Smith v Eric S Bush ・ Smith v Gardner Merchant ・ Smith v Glasgow City District Council ・ Smith v Hughes ・ Smith v Knights of Columbus ・ Smith v Land and House Property Corp ・ Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd ・ Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd ・ Smith v Parsons ・ Smith v Smith ・ Smith v. Allwright ・ Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County ・ Smith v. Bolles ・ Smith v. California ・ Smith v. Commissioner ・ Smith v. Doe ・ Smith v. Goguen ・ Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. ・ Smith v. Maryland ・ Smith v. Pilots Union ・ Smith v. Spisak ・ Smith v. Summit Entertainment LLC ・ Smith v. Texas ・ Smith v. Texas (2007) ・ Smith v. United States ・ Smith v. Van Gorkom ・ Smith Valley, Indiana Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Smith v. Bolles ： ウィキペディア英語版 Smith v. Bolles ''Smith v. Bolles'', , was an action to recover out-of-pocket damages for alleged fraudulent representations in the sale of shares of mining stock. The plaintiff was denied ''benefit of the bargain'' damages. The case is important in contract law, specifically legal remedies and compensating expectancies. ==Facts== Plaintiff, Richard J. Bolles, agreed to buy from defendant Lewis W. Smith four thousand shares of the stock, at $1.50 per share. The contract was completed in March, 1880, by the payment of $6,000. Plaintiff then alleged that defendant's representations regarding the stock were false and fraudulent, and that in fact the stock was worthless. Plaintiff claimed furthermore that had the representations been true, the stock would now be worth $10 per share, and so plaintiff claimed that he had sustained damages of $40,000. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Smith v. Bolles」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.